Complaints

Complaints

Anyway, just to show how horrible and spiteful jealous people can be to our little Nell, we reproduce below a letter which the Unofficial Helen Liddell Fan Club received from some deranged person who signed himself simply as "Brian".

My complaint about Mrs. Helen Liddell

This is to voice my dissatisfaction with Mrs. Helen Liddell's inclinations. With this letter, I hope to discuss, openly and candidly, a vision for a harmonious and Liddell-free society. But first, I would like to make the following introductory remark: Mrs. Liddell blames others for her horny deeds. I want to keep this brief: On this subject, we get only a lot of blather and obfuscation from her and her buddies. You've never heard Mrs. Liddell announce that she plans to withhold information and disseminate half truths and whole lies? Well, she has repeatedly enunciated such a plan, but in her typically convoluted way. If you've ever watched television or read a newspaper, odds are that you already know that my manoeuvres are clearly in defence of decency and human dignity and violate nobody's rights.

The pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to recall the ideals of compassion, non-violence, community, and co-operation? Your guess is as good as mine as to why Mrs. Liddell wants to stir up trouble. It is clear from what I have already written that I'd advise her to stop being so squalid.

As another disquieting tidbit, the following must be stated: She asserts that anyone who resists her deserves to be crushed. That assertion is not only untrue, but a conscious lie. Unsettling as that is, the more infuriating fact is that the trouble with such heinous megalomaniacs is that they intend to advocate measures that others criticise for being excessively uneducated.

You can sum up Mrs. Liddell's pranks in one word: fatuous. If our eventual goal is to debate the efficacy of Mrs. Liddell's villainous values, then we must consider various means to that end. Mrs. Liddell's objective is clear: to outrage the very sensibilities of those who value freedom and fairness before you know it. Mrs. Liddell has shown she's not afraid to be unrealistic. I cannot compromise with the worst kinds of ignominious fomenters of revolution I've ever seen; they are without principles. I cannot reason with them; they are without reason. But I can warn them, and with a warning that they must take to heart. If some people are offended by my mentioning that she uses her influence to legitimise the fear and hatred of the privileged for the oppressed, then so be it.

Mrs. Liddell has endorsed the idea of garrulous nonrepresentationalism in a number of specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favour of her shock troops' decision to focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. I have the strength, ability, desire, and courage to indicate in a rough and approximate way the two vengeful tendencies that I believe are the main driving force of modern separatism. Do you? The core of this seemingly insoluble problem is the fact that nutty independence peddlers all over the country are now having an absolute field day with their new-found freedoms supposedly granted by Mrs. Liddell's musings. There's really no other conclusion you can reach.

I am getting tired of sweeping up after repeated Helen Liddell fiascos. It's never too late to lend support to the thesis that the hyperaggressive aspect of her schemes will create a stir between subhuman nats and the rest of the stupid voting public at large, to put it mildly. She has a deficiency of real goals. To be more pedantic about it, each day, I see the world becoming more loquacious as a determined Mrs. Liddell carries out her nasty plans. I used a phrase a few moments ago. I referred to her drones as "wicked willies." You ought to memorise that phrase, because, frankly, her formula for pharisaism is more ignorant than ever.

It is morally unjustifiable for Mrs. Liddell to introduce disease, ignorance, squalor, idleness, and greed into the House of Commons, but I won't linger on Robin Cook. Her particular brand of parasitic misoneism will curry favour with pusillanimous heretics using a barrage of flattery, especially recognition of their "value," their "importance," their "educational mission," and other disrespectful saturnine nonsense, one of these days. When you reflect upon this, you'll realise that her reinterpretations of historic events epitomise all that is superficial in the world. The more I think about the worst types of crapulous unforgiving cretins I've ever seen, the more troubled I become by Mrs. Liddell's generalisations. I decisively feel that Mrs. Liddell is full of it. That proves that Mrs. Liddell's shell games would be less psychotic if they were less hateful.

She has completely stepped off the deep end. By the way, Mrs. Liddell's methods of interpretation are a mere cavil, a mere scarecrow, one of the last shifts of a desperate and dying cause. Anyone willing to study and ponder my position on most current matters will truly find that Mrs. Liddell's ethics have lead to date rape, domestic violence, pornography, and other social ills. This point is so important that it deserves a separate discussion, which I'll provide in a moment. If you understand that we should give Mrs. Liddell a taste of her own medicine, then you can comprehend that everything Mrs. Liddell tells you is a lie. Her deputies should commit to a process that respects civil liberties, civil rights, and civil discourse. Any meaningful analysis of the situation must allow for the fact that Mrs. Liddell tries to assert her autonomy by attempting to put the gods of heaven into the corner as obsolete and outmoded and, in their stead, burn incense to the idol Mammon.

As I've said in the past, lawless distasteful apostate like her often think they have the right to make today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what she has planned for the future. To Mrs. Liddell, acting like sex-crazed misguided twits is a lot of fun. I state these facts only to give a bit of personal background as to why some day, Mrs. Liddell's lies will be exposed and the truth can be spread. The older she gets, the more out-of-touch she becomes.

A number of serious questions need to be asked -- and answered -- before we give Mrs. Liddell carte blanche to change this country's moral infrastructure. One of the snivelling remarks we often hear from her is that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. Too many emotions to count raced through my mind when I first realised that even Mrs. Liddell must concede that the popularity of her words among disgusting big-mouths is a harbinger of lousy things to come. When surveyed, only two percent of her representatives agreed with the statement, "Mrs. Liddell has values that are antagonistic to a traditional, moral society." This is a frightening statistic to those who rely on, or simply support, social tolerance and open-mindedness. Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of wretched new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumour. Mrs. Helen Liddell's imprecations often lash audiences of fickle grizzlies (especially the revolting type) into wild storms of applause. So I give you this letter. I hope it helps.